OpenAI introduced a new model ChatGPT o1 which promises to be a major breakthrough in the world of artificial intelligence. But behind all the loud statements and improvements there are a number of important questions. What really makes this model unique? How does it improve on its predecessors, and, most importantly what are its weaknesses.
How Is ChatGPT o1 Better than Previous Models?
More Data, More Insight
ChatGPT o1 significantly improves on its predecessors with a number of key improvements. The main innovation is the ability to perform deeper logical reasoning and break down complex questions into their component parts.
The o1 model can imitate the human thought process. Unlike previous versions, which provided answers based on existing data, ChatGPT o1 “thinks” before answering. This allows it to solve problems that require multi-faceted analysis, such as Olympiad math problems or PhD-level questions, which was previously unavailable to AI models.
Fewer Mistakes
Comparisons with other models such as ChatGPT 4-o show that ChatGPT o1 reduced the rate of errors and false statements-hallucinations. In a number of tests such as GPQA-Diamond (448 PhD-level questions), ChatGPT o1 showed higher accuracy, handling 42% of questions correctly, while GPT-4 answered only 38% correctly.
Answering Multi-Task Queries
The new model is much better at handling multi-task queries. For example, if a user asks several questions in one query, such as: “My computer is broken, is it under warranty? And how long will it take to fix it?” The model can simultaneously analyze warranty and service dates, which previous versions could not do
With these improvements, ChatGPT o1 is suitable for a wider range of tasks—from technical consultations to analyzing complex financial issues and navigating legal aspects. This enhanced versatility could appeal to industries such as online betting platforms like NZ Ivibet, where accurate, multi-task handling is essential.
What’s Good and What’s Bad: ChatGPT o1 Limitations
Despite ChatGPT o1 impressive achievements, the new model has a number of significant limitations. One of the key issues is the lack of the ability to browse the Internet and process files or images. This means that AI cannot solve problems related to downloading data or performing complex computational operations. This limits its use in a number of professional areas. Among them are big data analysis or technical research.
An additional problem is the speed of work. Although ChatGPT o1 is capable of deeper processing of requests thanks to the “thinking” function, this can lead to significant delays in the response. Users may experience a wait of several seconds to a minute.
Despite its high performance in solving complex problems such as scientific analysis and legal research, ChatGPT o1 does not always live up to expectations in everyday use. For simpler tasks related to everyday questions, the model may be inferior to previous versions, such as GPT-4o.
Another potential problem is that some of the claimed capabilities, such as “logical thinking”, may be more of a marketing ploy than a real breakthrough. The “thinking” function, when the model demonstrates the process of thinking, does not always accurately reflect the actual work of the model, which can mislead users.
Usage Risks
Dangerous Scenarios
One of the main risks associated with the use of ChatGPT o1 is the possibility of its exploitation in potentially dangerous scenarios. Although the model has been tested for resilience to requests for malicious actions, its capabilities still raise concerns.
Manipulative AI
In addition, ChatGPT o1 has significant persuasive power. This makes it especially dangerous in the context of misinformation and manipulation. External auditors have noted that o1 produces more detailed and convincing answers than previous models, which increases the risk that people may trust false information generated by the model (called “hallucinations”). Particularly worrying is that the model can become manipulative when it comes to tasks where it receives hidden instructions.
Security Issue
The model has been criticized for the risk of its security systems being bypassed. While o1 is more resilient to hacks than previous versions, tests have so far shown vulnerabilities that allow the model to be used in contextual schemes where it can fool its own defenses
What’s Next?
There’s no denying that OpenAI’s ChatGPT o1 is a step forward in the world of artificial intelligence. But this step comes with challenges. The model shows significant improvements in terms of accuracy and depth of understanding, but its power can lead to misuse. In addition, the high resource requirements and possible risks to data privacy leave room for further improvement.
